SchraderTheiss768
Although some health-related scientists agreed upon the new functions discovered and explained by Kanner, others didnt accept his ideas, claiming that autism couldnt be separated from other neurological disorders. A lot of healthcare scientists disagreed with Kanner and completely refused to see autism as a distinctive syndrome. This was due to the fact that Kanner failed to clarify a variety of aspects of autism, leaving critical gaps in his analysis.
By contrast, scientists who accepted Kanners ideas quickly started to apply his model of diagnosis in their psychiatric practice. Nonetheless, taking into consideration the truth that Kanners idea of autism was confusing, most medical scientists who adopted his theories applied the model of diagnosis as well broadly. Due to misinterpretation of Kanners ideas, more and much more folks who suffered from neurological disorders were inappropriately diagnosed with autism.
The idea of autism was finally clarified by Rutter in the late 70s. Rutter introduced new terminologies and created new theories that would adjust the all round interpretation of autism. In an try to eradicate the confusion that surrounded the concept of autism, Rutter focused his function on enhancing Kanners model of diagnosis. Some of the new criteria introduced by Rutter in the procedure of diagnosing autism were:
- Onset of the syndrome in early childhood, by the age of 30 months
- Abnormal social development (regarded separately from intellectual development)
- Slow and impaired development of speech (regarded separately from intellectual development)
- Poor adaptation capabilities, stereotype behaviors and insistence on routine.
Although Kanner claimed that autism and intellectual retardation ought to be regarded as two separate, distinctive units, Rutter revealed that the notion of autism included some degree of intellectual retardation. Rutter refused to accept that autism should be diagnosed with out measuring the levels of overall performance intelligence and proved that Kanners syndrome and impaired cognitive functions went hand in hand. Even though this fact might seem controversial and contradictory to Kanners findings, the truth is that the Austrian scientist failed to properly measure the IQ levels of the subjects he studied. In reality, Kanner only discovered very good memory and logical skills in his subjects, not accounting for other elements of efficiency intelligence. Rutter explained that in spite of their good memory and good logical capabilities, most autistics present some degree of impaired mental judgment.
Rutters work had clarified several elements of autism, enabling medical scientists to diagnose the syndrome in a much more precise and approachable manner. Rutters improved model of diagnosis was a huge step forward in the practice of psychiatry, clarifying certain elements omitted by his predecessors. Despite the fact that there are still several uncertain elements relating to the syndrome identified by Kanner, today medical scientists are in a position to appropriately diagnose kids with autism. mental health services virginia counseling richmond va reviews research counseling richmond va